This September I had the pleasure of joining the 21st
century and updated to a smart phone, finally turning off my four year old LG
Rumor II for good. One of the features I found on my phone was something called
“Flip Board”. For those who are not familiar with Flip Board, it is an app
which allows the user to select particular topics and read the latest stories
about them. Originally I was excited to keep myself in the loop regarding politics
and events around the world but then I found the “A Blog About History” flip
board and I was in heaven. Just today I was able to learn about excavations that
uncovered a Roman temple in England, and slave tunnels at Hadrian’s Villa in
Italy, as well as learning about a new television series coming out this fall
that will follow two soldiers in the trenches of Ypres during the First World
War. Twenty years ago I would have had to wait for excavation reports to be
published in academic journals before I found anything out about either dig
site. The digital world has made me more connected to history than I ever was
before.
Still Image from "The Wipers Times" airing on BBC. Image from: http://metro.co.uk/2013/09/11/world-war-i-comedy-drama-the-wipers-times-mixed-humour-with-humanity-3959186/
On Monday in Digital History, the question: “What is Digital
History/ Humanities?” was asked. To me, digital history is the use of digital
resources to enhance the experience of history for everyone, regardless of
whether they are academic or not. It’s not just digitalizing archives to make
the lives of academics easier but the “This Day in History” app, history based
computer games, and virtual museum exhibits. Digital history includes
accessibility, making far away museums closer to those who cannot afford to
travel the world to see such things or creating a framework for history that is
more interesting than sitting in a classroom or reading a 300 page book on a
particular subject. Studying history in-depth is not for everyone but that does
not mean that history should not be accessible to everyone in some form.
However there are pitfalls to digital history to be certain.
Only a decade and a half ago I sat with my dad and watched grainy film footage
of the First World War on the History Channel and learned that there were no “good guys and bad guys”
in history. Now when I turn to that once beloved station
I find myself being informed of the possible price a Yankee baseball card could bring, although the seller will never receive that price because the pawn broker is running a business not a
charity. Worse, amateur historians have tried to convince me that aliens created ancient
Egyptian pyramids and the colossal Nasca Lines of Peru. The History Channel only
becomes what I remember of it when an anniversary approaches (Remembrance
Day, Pearl Harbour) and the rest of the time it is saturated with information
that is more about heritage (and baseless hypotheses) than history. The digital
world will surely, and perhaps already has, become like the History Channel: brief,
bright moments of critical thought with historical backing amongst the clamour
of 140 character posts where history need not apply because it won’t fit.
Still image from "Ancient Aliens". Image from: https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEivyFCRVTFZ1NWw52ruuu3f47zygCxxPveq3iP7G1e3_fvULfyFktlVzAm9fuXiSdxhq1ok-dmqRKbKonAUpIGxfKkihdx1RwAkn66iLnIYs-VWLRKiG64wDlWiIqrLEpz4iPLo25dTu6I/s320/giorgio-tsoukalos.jpeg
I apologize, I have just realized how narrow-minded and
elitist that sounded. Don’t mistake what I have said for thumping a military-history-is-the-only-history
chest or suggesting that heritage is not as important as history. Rather,
heritage is the backbone for what spurs people forward to seek out history. Ancestry.com
is the most popular example of this. People intrigued with their family’s
past can trace themselves back to specific points in time. Those
particularly keen to learn what prompted their female ancestor to leave
Ireland in 1850 will reveal the Great Potato Famine and the mistreatment that
the Irish suffered under British rule leading up to that tragic event. Heritage in digital history can result in a furthering of historical knowledge that may not have been undertaken otherwise.
For that reason I think it is important for historians and public
historians to become more engaged with the ever changing face of digital
resources for educating the general populace. Sometimes a particular
technophobia arises among our ranks, myself included as I just begrudgingly set
up my first Twitter account, but there is a growing necessity for digital literacy
in the binary world of the Internet and social media. If we as historians do
not keep up with the changes and utilize them to our benefit, we will become
just as archaic as the ancient times we study. Based on the Darwinian frame of
mind, historians of both academic and public background must, “adapt or die”.
Sources:
http://www.ablogabouthistory.com/#sthash.NOrBEZdp.dpbs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_(Ireland)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazca_Lines
https://flipboard.com
I really liked your statement about the consequences of historians not keeping up with our ever-changing world. As someone who thought they'd never have a twitter account, I'm definitely starting to realize the potential of being able to use only 140 characters to reach a global audience that I may not be otherwise able to connect with! This prompted a question for me though; what will happen to historians who don't adopt society's increasing dependence on technology? Will history method courses be dealing with things like Twitter and blogs in the future? Should they?
ReplyDelete